<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verifying domain name ownership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/05/14/verifying-domain-name-ownership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/05/14/verifying-domain-name-ownership/</link>
	<description>a blog about building stuff on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:45:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Yu</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/05/14/verifying-domain-name-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Yu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlineaspect.com/?p=228#comment-581</guid>
		<description>You got a PageRank 5 link from TechCrunch-- good job! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got a PageRank 5 link from TechCrunch&#8211; good job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/05/14/verifying-domain-name-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlineaspect.com/?p=228#comment-478</guid>
		<description>Well, in their defense, I think at least part of the idea is to cover the cost of the data transmission (since you don&#039;t pay a service fee for the wireless connection in the Kindles).  That being said though, I think they should either build that in to the cost of the device or move to a monthly &quot;all-you-can-eat&quot; subscription.  Just charge me $10 / month (or whatever) to download all the normally free content I want.  At least that model I could get my head around and I might &lt;i&gt;consider&lt;/i&gt; reading blogs on my Kindle. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in their defense, I think at least part of the idea is to cover the cost of the data transmission (since you don&#39;t pay a service fee for the wireless connection in the Kindles).  That being said though, I think they should either build that in to the cost of the device or move to a monthly &quot;all-you-can-eat&quot; subscription.  Just charge me $10 / month (or whatever) to download all the normally free content I want.  At least that model I could get my head around and I might <i>consider</i> reading blogs on my Kindle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/05/14/verifying-domain-name-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlineaspect.com/?p=228#comment-476</guid>
		<description>How do you verify ownership for blogs hosted on eblogger/livejournal/wordpress etc? I don&#039;t think this is a simple domain verification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you verify ownership for blogs hosted on eblogger/livejournal/wordpress etc? I don&#8217;t think this is a simple domain verification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/05/14/verifying-domain-name-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlineaspect.com/?p=228#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Amen to that.  You rock, Josh! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that.  You rock, Josh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/05/14/verifying-domain-name-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlineaspect.com/?p=228#comment-473</guid>
		<description>It wouldn&#039;t be an issue if they weren&#039;t charging for otherwise free content in the first place.  :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#039;t be an issue if they weren&#039;t charging for otherwise free content in the first place.  <img src='http://www.onlineaspect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/05/14/verifying-domain-name-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlineaspect.com/?p=228#comment-472</guid>
		<description>I saw this on TechCrunch and I was quite surprised Amazon had no ownership verification. I would think verification would be one of the first things you do in a situation like this. 
 
Google has definitely set a good example. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this on TechCrunch and I was quite surprised Amazon had no ownership verification. I would think verification would be one of the first things you do in a situation like this. </p>
<p>Google has definitely set a good example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
