<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too many DNS lookups in an SPF record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/</link>
	<description>a blog about building stuff on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:55:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ColdFusion Developer</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/comment-page-1/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>ColdFusion Developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>Good article. I didn&#039;t realize there is a cap of 10 lookups. This makes setting up SPF records for people that use Google Apps, blackberries, and web servers that send out emails need to really pay attention to this kind of stuff!  I agree that the SPF standard needs some work in order to meet real-world needs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. I didn&#039;t realize there is a cap of 10 lookups. This makes setting up SPF records for people that use Google Apps, blackberries, and web servers that send out emails need to really pay attention to this kind of stuff!  I agree that the SPF standard needs some work in order to meet real-world needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/comment-page-1/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 20:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>Thanks Josh! I didn&#039;t know about this before and you helped alot. :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Josh! I didn&#039;t know about this before and you helped alot. <img src='http://www.onlineaspect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ableal</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>ableal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>&gt; I also replaced aspmx.googlemail.com with _spf.google.com which is what it redirects to anyway. Technically, this isn&#8217;t a good idea since Google could change it on me 
 
As of July 2010, &quot;include:_spf.google.com&quot; is their official recommendation, cf. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=178723&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?ans...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
(This is for anyone coming later; thank you for the post) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I also replaced aspmx.googlemail.com with _spf.google.com which is what it redirects to anyway. Technically, this isn&rsquo;t a good idea since Google could change it on me </p>
<p>As of July 2010, &quot;include:_spf.google.com&quot; is their official recommendation, cf. <a href="http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=178723" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?ans&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>(This is for anyone coming later; thank you for the post)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 00:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this clarification. I&#039;m just getting started with SPF, and I discovered that by merely adding two ESPs (MailChimp and SurveyGizmo), I&#039;ve blown past the limit! This makes SPF &#039;not ready for prime time&#039;, a toy unfit for real-world purpose.

(BTW the caret in invisible in Firefox - makes it hard to type).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this clarification. I&#8217;m just getting started with SPF, and I discovered that by merely adding two ESPs (MailChimp and SurveyGizmo), I&#8217;ve blown past the limit! This makes SPF &#8216;not ready for prime time&#8217;, a toy unfit for real-world purpose.</p>
<p>(BTW the caret in invisible in Firefox &#8211; makes it hard to type).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  Your post was helpful, and helped me to resolve some of my SPF record issues. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  Your post was helpful, and helped me to resolve some of my SPF record issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/comment-page-1/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/#comment-753</guid>
		<description>thanks man....nice post </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks man&#8230;.nice post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roseanne</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Roseanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/#comment-746</guid>
		<description>This was a very informative post.  Thanks for taking the time to write it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very informative post.  Thanks for taking the time to write it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noam Rthaus</title>
		<link>http://www.onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Noam Rthaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlineaspect.com/2009/03/20/too-many-dns-lookups-in-an-spf-record/#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the help. I had the exactly the same problem, I just replaced a few a: references to ip4: references. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the help. I had the exactly the same problem, I just replaced a few a: references to ip4: references.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

